AstraZeneca to be sued over 'defective' jab – say MSM
Hopes high the breakthrough of revealing full horror is finally happening
By Oliver May
ASTRAZENECA’S Covid jab – which saw its creator Sarah Gilbert handed a dame hood – has been found to be defective and the company is set to be sued for damages.
Countless people, who put their trust in the UK Government after they repeatedly urged them to take the “safe and effective” jab, have been injured and killed because of it, including BBC journalist Lisa Shaw.
Her partner, Gareth Eve, tweeted last night: “Fighting for the acknowledgment, apology and support so many families need after such tragic, unnecessary losses and life changing injuries.
It’s time the Government and AstraZeneca sat down with us and sorted this out. For Lisa x.”
The Telegraph reported this morning: “Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ [our inverted commas] has been branded “defective” in a multi-million pound landmark legal action that will suggest claims over its efficacy were “vastly overstated”.
“The pharmaceutical giant is being sued in the High Court in a test case by Jamie Scott, a father of two who suffered a significant permanent brain injury that has left him unable to work as a result of a blood clot after receiving the jab in April 2021.
“A second claim is being brought by the widower and two young children of 35-year-old Alpa Tailor, who died after having the jab made by AstraZeneca, the UK-based pharmaceutical giant.
“The test cases could pave the way for as many as 80 damages claims worth an estimated £80 million over a new condition known as vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) that was identi ed by specialists in the wake of the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine rollout.”
It is nothing more than media outlets such as News Uncut have been reporting for the past two years, but it is nonetheless somewhat of a relief to see such a story validated by a mainstream press who have been nothing short of biased on the issue, censoring anything but the Government line.
In a strange move, however, the newspaper saw fit to run a subdeck headline saying, ‘In the end, the AstraZeneca vaccine just wasn’t as good as its rivals’, something which we already know to be blatantly incorrect, as both Pfizer and Moderna produced Covid jabs which are arguably worse and have caused far more injuries and deaths; Pfizer in particular was more widely used across the world so the numbers of adverse effects will be higher. The efficacy of these products is also under question.
News Uncut hopes it will not be long before that statement is corrected and all these Big Pharma companies are brought to book.
BBC’S DAMAGE ALREADY DONE, APOLOGY OR NOT
WHILE the BBC might have said sorry for plastering coverage of Andrew Bridgen’s speech in Parliament with pro ‘vaccine’ propaganda they make no apology for the damage their actions have done.
On October 20, Bridgen was finally ‘granted’ a debate on what is causing the horrific number of excess deaths. Much of the evidence points to the roll-out of the Covid jabs – but the BBC’s Parliament channel decided to run a series of captions claiming to correct what he was saying.
The BBC received a series of complaints about their behaviour and, on Monday, issued a statement making an apology.
A BBC spokesman said: “We accept there was a lack of consistency in the use of our captions and that the number posted during the speech was not proportionate, nor always relevant which created the incorrect impression that there was an editorial approach in relation to the views expressed. We apologise for this and are reviewing the way we use such captions during proceedings.”
Plenty of people would have seen those captions, but News Uncut is concerned that very few people would have been privy to the apology. Job done, BBC.
BEST OF SOCIAL MEDIA
SOME complain that social media is toxic – but there really is a lot of decent content out there.
Including this tweet and picture from “David Morgan”, which just about sums up the state of the world we live in right now:
So much in this post, great stuff thank you. In my own life, all I can do is stand my ground in this truth as we can see it and send out positivity and love to those who have the challenge and stress of confronting the awfully rigged system. I do hope they get compensation. As far as the contemptuous BBC is concerned, this is always their policy. Give wrong information in headlines and apologies via a tiny back door that no one sees. I like to believe that they will fall along with all those of their ilk, I sure hope I am alive to see it. Not having social media I would have missed that post with Charlie so thank you for that it was great!
A 35 year old with two children, dead, for what? Nothing, it was a completely senseless death. I think of it as murder by AstraZenica they absolutely knew the risk with the adenovirus vector injection. AstraZenica were playing Russian roulette but I am very certain not with themselves.