HAVE I GOT VIEWS FOR YOU: No more jabs for kids? Non-story...
HAVE I GOT VIEWS FOR YOU: No more jabs for kids? Non-story...
More censorship from those many still trust
COMMENT By Oliver May
MASSIVE headline news this week. You will not forget all the front-page headlines, will you? All the screaming BREAKING NEWS flashes across your TV screen. No chance.
You know what I’m talking about, don’t you?
The United Kingdom this week banned mRNA Covid jabs for children under 12.
What do you mean you did not see, hear or read any news of it?
The UK media thrive on huge stories such as this. They would never ignore a legitimate, hard news story.
Except that they did.
The Government is effectively saying jabs for children under 12 are not, after all, “safe and effective”.
So where does that leave all those children who took them? All those parents who rushed their little kiddies to the jab bus, doctors, pop-up clinic, wherever, so they could get a little sticker?
US commentator Dr Naomi Wolf said: “Either it’s safe now, in which case, why change it? Or it wasn’t safe, then, in which case you’ve harmed and possibly murdered a bunch of British children.”
Ladies and gentleman, the Government you continue to trust.
A SEVENTY-THREE year old man said these following quotes and you would be wise to take caution.
“We have to put ourselves on what might be called a war-like footing.”
“We need a vast military-style campaign to marshal the strength of the global private sector.”
“[We need a] Marshall-like plan for nature, people and the planet”.
“Nature is, in fact, the lifeblood of our financial markets and, as such, we must rapidly realign our own economy to mimic nature’s economy and work in harmony with it.”
“We have a unique but rapidly shrinking window of opportunity to learn lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable path.”
“Systems and pathways must be redesigned to advance net zero transitions globally.”
“It’s [the pandemic] unprecedented shockwaves may well make people more receptive to big visions of change,”
He called for regional emissions allowances in advance and to let companies bid for “permits to pollute.”
“Ladies and gentlemen, we are doing it for the pandemic, so if you don’t mind me saying so, we must also do it for the planet.”
“People who are unvaccinated are at least 10 times more likely to be hospitalised or die than those who have had two vaccine doses.”
“That is why we urge everyone to get vaccinated and to take up the booster, as we have done ourselves.”
Why should you take caution? Because he is now Britain’s King.
PS:
MY seven-year old son was due to have football training yesterday, ahead of a friendly today as his side prepares for the new season. They would no doubt have paid their respect to The Queen with a minute’s silence before the session and before the match.
Instead, the English Football Association cancelled all football from grassroots up. And so he had nothing to do except run about the house playing hide and seek, or playing video games, reading – anything but pay any kind of respects to anyone.
Well done, football.
"Dr. Naomi Wolf" statement is incorrect. Something can be unsafe now that was safe then, if its adverse events are dependent on cumulative or repeated doses. Myocarditis is one such well documented SAESI.
However there is no evidence that the jabs were ever safe and effective, because the trials were never completed. FDA refused to release data for the incomplete trials, and there is cause (both whistleblower and re-analysis) to suspect fraud.
Posted too quickly : societies which sacrifice children, the young, the healthy, the self employed as ours and many others have done- all in the nameof 'following the science' - are not fit for purpose and cannot be trusted.