HAVE I GOT VIEWS FOR YOU: Puppet Starmer is "no action and no words" as Czechs reveal horrifying jab data
New face, same old story. But we knew that, didn't we...
By Oliver May
STUDIES released by the Czech Republic Government have found the Moderna jab to be 50 per cent more deadly than the Pfizer one – which is in itself twice as lethal as Novavax.
In a normal world, the World Economic Forum’s new UK puppet Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, would have his so-called all-action cabinet calling a halt to all of these shots with immediate effect.
Instead, there is the usual silence and distractions such as stories of great swathes of the Green Belt being littered with solar panels.
Dr Claire Craig, interviewed by News Uncut’s Jasmine Birtles this week, worked with investigative journalist Steve Kirsch on analysing the data, which was also mentioned in another News Uncut podcast with Andrew Bridgen.
On Tuesday, Dr Craig tweeted: “People given Moderna in Czechia died more than people given Pfizer. This was true across the age ranges. It was true across different time periods. Moderna was three times the dose of mRNA in the same LNP as Pfizer – it makes sense.
“Here is the ratio of ALL cause mortality (deaths/population) for those given Moderna as a ratio of the mortality for those given Pfizer by age. In the older age groups there are more background deaths. The increased mortality from Moderna therefore gets diluted out more.
“Could this be a difference in lives saved? If it were an efficacy difference we should see the impact of Covid waves over time and we don’t. To take a simple example. In all of 2021 there were three Covid-attributed deaths of 20-24 year olds.
“Three quarters of Covid deaths were in the first half of year before this age group were injected. If the ones given Moderna had the Pfizer mortality, there would have been six deaths a year after second dose. There were 15.
“By the same reasoning we can assume a standard sized population had either Moderna or Pfizer for each age group. Here is how many would be dead in the Pfizer group as a percentage of the Moderna group.
“The picture looks just as bad for AstraZeneca – which was the only other drug given to large numbers. We only have death to end 2022, so those with longest follow up would have been prioritised and sickest.
“In older age groups the excess from vaccine is diluted out by the large number of background deaths.
“I think Steve's claim of 50 per cent is likely an underestimate for how much more deadly Moderna was than Pfizer – because it is an all-cause ratio. The ratio of the excess deaths due to each would be higher.
NOVAK DJOKOVIC may have lost the Wimbledon final on Sunday but in many people’s eyes he remains a winner.
Except, that is, for much of the British Press.
Djokovic took to task some of the Wimbledon crowd after his fourth-round match against Holger Rune on July 8 because he said they were booing him. He called them “disrespectful”.
The BBC courtside interviewer, Rishi Persad, suggested those members of the crowd were simply chanting “Ruuuuuune” for their opponent. Djokovic said in response: “I know they were cheering for Rune but that's an excuse to also boo. I have been on the tour for more than 20 years. I know all the tricks.”
At least three of the UK’s national newspapers decided they knew better than Djokovic, saying there was no booing.
Instead of writing, ‘Djokovic said he heard booing but others suggested fans were chanting ‘Ruuuune’, those newspaper reporters shut down Djokovic’s side of the story.
Censorship is alive and well in the Gutter Press it appears.
IT IS the time of year when young school children will be filled with joy – and perhaps apprehension – that their primary school years have ended and a new chapter begins.
Those aged 11 will be heading to secondary school in September.
One of the final remaining tasks as a primary school pupil is to receive their end-of-year report. On that report, goes a short comment from the pupil themselves.
News Uncut has been made aware of one 11 year old girl who wrote this sentence as part of her short input to her report: “I won’t miss Year 6 that much.”
But that line did not make it to the report that she brought home.
Upon reading it, the two teachers in charge of her class shouted at her: “That’s not a very nice or positive thing to say is it?!”
And off the 11 year old girl was marched to the school’s bad behaviour room, where it was demanded she rewrite her input. She had to do so in front of a gathering of other teachers too.
Is this a school, or is this a mini prison camp, complete with little dictators fuelled by the powerful feeling they get when bullying children?
The girl will definitely not miss Year 6 now. Would you?
Censorship is alive and well in schools too…
A NEWS UNCUT subscription is just £3.50 per month. Subscribing will help fund our journalism from a wider variety of sources. Thank you for your continued support.