Discover more from News Uncut: Straight Talk, Hard Truths
HAVE WE NOT SACRIFICED ENOUGH OF OUR CITIZENS THROUGH IGNORANCE AND GREED?
YouTube U-turn after BANNING MP's speech to Parliament
By Oliver May
A SPEECH made by an MP to the UK Parliament – which can be read in its entirety on Government website Hansard – was censored by YouTube before being reinstated the following day.
Andrew Bridgen, MP for North-West Leicestershire, read out a damning 3000-word speech to the House of Commons on Friday citing the “scale of harms that the experimental vaccines have caused”. Just six out of 650 members of Parliament bothered to attend.
In fact, the moment Bridgen stood to speak, some MP’s got up and walked out, appearing to be led by Andrew Mitchell, MP for Sutton Coldfield, who tapped people on the shoulder as if to remind them it was time to go.
Later that day, the video of Bridgen’s speech was taken down by YouTube, the tech giant claiming its contents were a “violation of community guidelines”.
Despite the “mounting evidence of harm” outlined by Bridgen, the reply by Will Quince, replying on behalf of Maria Caulfield, Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, was almost 1000 words long, but simply amounted to: “Data shows that Covid-19 boosters have been highly effective in reducing hospitalisations and deaths. The mortality rate has been significantly lower for people who have had at least a third dose or booster dose, compared with individuals who are unvaccinated, or have received just a first or second dose.
“In summary, we know that the Covid vaccine programme has saved tens of thousands of lives and has prevented many more hospitalisations.”
Referring to a speech given to Parliament on December 13, Bridgen explained how two things happened. He said: “First, I was cancelled by the mainstream media. Despite sending a data sheet in the wake of the debate, scientifically evidencing every point that I made, not one media organisation wanted to talk about the issue of serious harms or deaths occurring as a result of the mRNA vaccines.
“I fully expect that the media will show the same level of disinterest in today’s debate. It is what we have come to expect from a media more interested in navel gazing at the pontifications of Britain’s foremost football pundit instead of the horror and tragedy of excess deaths taking place before their eyes.”
Indeed they did. The Daily Express, which has started to run a campaign of Justice for Jab Victims despite printing misinformtion of just 59 deaths and a ‘small’ number of adverse events, notably ignored Bridgen speech in its Saturday edition. It also failed to report YouTube’s censoring.
Bridgen added: “In truth, I care little about being cancelled by the media, because, in the wake of that speech, something far more important has happened. I was contacted by thousands of people offering their support and received many hundreds and hundreds of emails from all around the globe recounting to me their own stories of the harms caused in the wake of their or their loved ones’ covid vaccination.
“Today, I once again ask the Minister why more is not being done, both in the United Kingdom and globally, to investigate and publicise the clear and well-documented adverse effects of covid-19 vaccines, vaccines that have made big pharma billions and also vaccines that have resulted in completely unprecedented levels of yellow card reports. The Government’s own data in this respect is damning.
“To prevent just one healthy adult aged between 50 and 59 from being hospitalised due to Covid, the Government’s own published data states that 43,600 people had to be given an autumn booster jab.
“With a serious adverse event rate of one in 800, that means that, in the healthy 50 to 59-year-old group, as a result of using the mRNA boosters, 55 people would die or be put into hospital with side effects to prevent one single Covid case presenting in hospital.
“The same data shows that, for healthy younger people, the number needed to be boosted to prevent a single hospital admission with Covid-19 is far higher. Some 92,500 booster jabs were required to be administered to prevent one hospitalisation due to covid in the healthy 40 to 49 age group, which would simultaneously have put 116 people at probability of death or serious adverse reaction into hospital from the jab.
“The healthy 30 to 39 age group required 210,400 booster jabs to prevent a single Covid hospitalisation, so 263 of this group will have been into hospital or, sadly, died as a result of the booster side effects just to keep one Covid case out of hospital.
“However, the data gets worse because hospitalisation does not necessarily mean a serious medical intervention such as intubation or oxygen. To prevent severe hospitalisation from Covid-19, the numbers needed to be boosted become astronomical.
“The Government’s own data shows that, in healthy adults aged 50 to 59, it was necessary to give 256,400 booster jabs to prevent just one severe hospitalisation, putting 321 people into hospital with a serious side-effect from the booster, which includes, obviously, risk of death.
“For healthy 40 to 49-year-olds, that number increases to 932,500 who needed to be boosted to keep one Covid patient out of an intensive therapy unit, putting potentially 1,165 people into hospital with serious harms, death or disability.
“And for healthy 30 to 39-year-olds, no one knows the answer to the number needed to be boosted to prevent a serious hospitalisation because the Government’s own data says that there has never been such a case of this age group being put into intensive care due to the current variant of Covid-19.
“But many, indeed on average one in 800 of this group that has been boosted, will have died, or been disabled or seriously harmed by the booster itself.”
Using a calculation of £44 per dose, £24 of which was paid to GPs and community pharmacies for administering them, Bridgen said: “From the Government’s own data on the use of boosters, it cost over £1.9million to prevent just one hospitalisation among healthy 50 to 59-year-olds and over £11m to prevent one serious hospitalisation due to Covid-19 in that age group; the cost to the taxpayer of preventing a hospitalisation of one healthy 40 to 49-year-old is over £4m; and for healthy 30 to 39-year-olds the cost of preventing just one hospitalisation is over £9m. Of course, to prevent serious hospitalisation in these groups, the cost is far higher.”
Bridgen added: “In the winter of 2020, the experimental mRNA vaccines were announced to the British public as ‘safe and effective’. It is interesting that the NHS website today describes the experimental vaccines as ‘safe and important’.
“The Government narrative of ‘safe and effective’ is in tatters, as evidenced by their own data. We have surely now sacrificed enough of our citizens on the side of ignorance and unfettered corporate greed to satisfy everyone?
“I therefore call on the Government to immediately stop the mRNA vaccine booster programme and initiate a full public inquiry into not only the vaccine harms but how every agency and institution set up to protect the public interest has failed so abysmally in its duties.”
Bridgen’s speech and answer in full: Hansard