Hostility and prejudice prevalent in Dimmock midazolam case
Disdain and aggression is blighting society's most vulnerable
By Sally Beck
OUR justice system should be unbiased, but a hostile environment is developing directed at the most vulnerable in society. Challenges to medical care and medical interventions upset the establishment to the degree prejudice is palpable. Instead of concern, there is disdain. Instead of empathy, there is aggression.
This was clear during the UK Covid-19 Inquiry. Hugo Keith KC, the barrister representing the Government, was particularly impatient with the vaccine injured and academics questioning the Covid narrative. It was clear in London’s High Court in 2021, when a judge barely tolerated barrister Francis Hoar KC. Hoar had asked for a judicial review to stop mandatory Covid “vaccines” for care workers and that the Government injunct Covid “vaccines” for 12–17-year-olds.
It was also clear at Southwark Coroner’s court in south London this past week, during Derek ‘Del’ Dimmock’s five-day inquest.
Del’s family believe he was euthanised by Royal Trinity Hospital (RTH), south London. It is the job of Senior Coroner Dr Julian Morris, a doctor and a lawyer, to listen impartially to the detail surrounding Del’s death but, from day one, Dr Morris showed clear prejudice against the Dimmock family and their barrister, James Bogle KC, irritated by his very breath.
Can you spare £3.50 a month? Or maybe £30 a year? That will provide full access to News Uncut’s content – including the remainder of this report – and will help us grow stronger in our bid to bring you more information the mainstream media refuse to report. Thank you.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to News Uncut: Straight Talk, Hard Truths to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.