If protesting warrants 'full force of the law' then surely child killers deserve the DEATH PENALTY?

This mess is Starmer's making. And probably on purpose. Far Right? He is far, far wrong.

By Oliver May

LOST in the cesspit of slurs thrown at those protesting across the United Kingdom this week was this: Three children aged six, seven and nine were murdered.

The new British Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, held a press conference to say those protesting would “feel the full force of the law”.

This week, just days after the bloodied, lifeless bodies of three young girls were taken to the morgue, ITV journalist Shehab Khan chose to ask the Prime Minister this: “What message do you have for the British Muslim community?”

Every single one – bar none – of those people protesting against the slaughter of three innocent children were smeared by the British Prime Minister and the British Press as “far right”.

Starmer’s bullish, rude and inciting press conference is to blame for all subsequent protests following the one at Southport on Tuesday.

And do you know, I have not seen anyone ask this question of Starmer: “What promises can you make to fearful mothers across the UK worried about taking their children out in public, especially given it is the school holidays? What are you doing to protect them?”

One can only deduce that Starmer – and the British Press – could not care a hoot whether more kids are slain. They certainly do not appear to care that those three innocent girls were butchered – unless you count Downing Street’s insulting attempt at a tribute by putting the building in pink lights.

So my question is this: If Starmer is only focused on showing protestors “the full force of the law”, surely an equal punishment to fit the crime would be for child killers – such as Axel Rudakubana – to face the death penalty.

Do we need these child killers in our society? Do we hope to rehabilitate such people so they can released back into society? Do we want to waste yet more our money via taxation keeping them alive in prison?

The death penalty for such heinous crimes as murdering children would surely act as more of a deterrent than our soft-style penal system.

Why more people are not speaking about this is a mystery. They have been consumed by talk of “far right” and the “English Defence League”. This has been inflamed by Starmer. This is his mess.

Why on earth did he not say something like the following:

People of Great Britain, I feel your anger, I feel your pain. But I am calling for calm. Trust me when I say the perpetrator of his abhorrent crime will feel the full force of the law. Trust me when I say I will eradicate knife crime. I am on your side. But we must work together. We must come together and unite, instead of tearing each other apart. I am here to serve you and I will listen.

Starmer is an intelligent, educated man, is he not? So why did he actively choose to target those totally fed-up of inaction by instead inflaming the situation, talking down to them and treating them like criminals?

You have to wonder whether he did it on purpose. Or, perhaps, was told to say it by those further up the chain in the World Economic Forum. Maybe it came from the Blair Institute.

Because now the Government is a step closer to introducing Facial Recognition. This can only be a precursor for full Digital ID, something Baroness Claire Fox claimed during an interview with News Uncut last month that the Government had “no appetite for”.

And this, rest assured, will then smooth the pathway for a Central Bank Digital Currency. Full totalitarian control.

Yes, the UK Government has hijacked the brutal slaying of three innocent children to introduce their dystopian nightmare.

Maajid Nawaz, ordinarily a person I would recommend anyone listen to, appears to have got this wrong too. Nawaz is attributing too much intelligence and clout to the tweet of former actor Laurence Fox.

Nawaz believes Fox is to blame for the first protest in Southport following a tweet which read: “Enough is enough. We need to permanently remove Islam from Great Britain.”

Does Fox really have that much influence? I’d wager that if you asked each and every person who attended that Southport protest if they knew who Laurence Fox was, more than 80 per cent would say no.

Fox did jump the gun on his tweet about Islam, which was sparked by a false report of the child murderer’s name on the internet, and he subsequently tarred everyone with the same brush.

But it appears that is now what Nawaz is doing. He is calling Fox a “neo-fascist” and also tarring anyone who is on those protests with the same brush. He has no evidence that each and every one of those protestors is targeting mosques, regardless of what the mainstream media is reporting.

And as for the MSM, this is their wet dream; a cornucopia of misinformation spewed as truth and vomited directly into your living room. This, for example, from ITV’s UK Editor Paul Brand: “They came with their hoods up. They wanted, in my view, a fight.”

They. Meaning Brand, in his duty as UK Editor, must have spoken to or witnessed every single protestor, yes? Otherwise it is a generalisation. And it is inflammatory language akin to “look at them, they’re worse than child killers”.

Look at any mainstream newspaper and they are all at it: “Hard right. Far right”.

How do they know? Did 100 per cent of the protestors have white skin and, therefore, in the eyes of the British Press, are therefore “hard/far right”? Maybe they are “just right”. Generalising when it comes to skin colour is nothing more than racism.

Perhaps, then, that is exactly what it is. Racism. Look at Starmer’s response to the violence of the Black Lives Matter protests. He took a knee. The British Police took a knee. They were a collective embarrassment.

What is also an embarrassment – no a nasty insult – is that this unraveling of a United Kingdom is the sole doing of your new British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who on Sunday, August 4 had another opportunity to ease tensions and instead incited more trouble.

He has carelessly thrown petrol on the flames of discontent by using the senseless murder of three young children to pursue Globalist goals.

Sadly it is working.

Far Right? Starmer, you are Far Wrong.