ITV pushes jabs in police drama, is Starmer taking the peace?... and AstraZeneca boss pockets £15million
The Digital Digest: News Uncut's take on stories from around the web.
By Gary Chappell
WRITERS of ITV police drama Unforgotten have created a character whose decision to tell his dad not to take a Covid “vaccine” ultimately led to the father dying of Covid.
Considering it was ITV who aired the drama ‘Breathtaking’, we should not be too surprised that it is trying to continually push this narrative.
The character in question is also portrayed as someone with mental health issues and is shown listening to online content surrounding Davos, the World Economic Forum and George Soros.
As the drama unfolds, the character has a police interview where he is also asked about the death of his father, which is unrelated to the main plot. The character explains how he had been listening to content about how the Covid “vaccine” was dangerous and was a plot to control the population. He then explains how he told his parents not to take the jab and, within days of refusing it, how his dad then caught Covid and later died.
Considering this is being aired in 2025 and that we already know the jabs do not stop you getting Covid, nor do they stop you transmitting Covid – not to mention the myriad of side effects including pericarditis, myocarditis, stroke, blood clots, heart failure etc, this kind of storyline is nothing short of abhorrent.
Ofcom have come down hard on television stations such as GB News for even highlighting dangers of the Covid “vaccine”, dangers which are now widely accepted. If they were impartial, Ofcom should also deal with ITV over this story.
You can complain to Ofcom about the ITV drama Unforgotten here, or call them on 0300 123 3333.
Starmer wants to deploy troops for peace…
PRIME Minister Keir Starmer believes putting UK troops on the ground in Ukraine will help deter Russian President Vladimir Putin and help bring peace.
Several news stations, including the BBC, have since launched polls asking: “Would you support Starmer putting UK troops in Ukraine?”
Surely the more pertinent question is: “Why does Starmer believe that inflaming a war that has nothing to do with the UK will help bring peace?”
Further still, why does Starmer believe that putting UK troops in Ukraine will somehow “deter” Putin?
What does he think Putin is going to say? “Oh no, the Brits are coming, we better retreat”.
US President Donald Trump has this week reportedly tried to negotiate a peace deal at a meeting in Saudi Arabia – something Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is unhappy about because he was not invited.
In reporting this story, however, MSM outlets – including the BBC – are publishing so-called misinformation by saying: ‘A full-scale Russian invasion sparked the war in Ukraine almost three years ago’.
If you want to know the real history of the war in Ukraine, then listen to Jeffrey Sachs (above). He outlines how the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies, ignited by none other than the USA.
AstraZeneca boss pockets £15million after profits rise
ASTRAZENECA chief executive Pascal Soriot was paid £14.7 million in 2024 after rising profits. This amount included a salary worth £1.5m, an annual bonus and long-term incentive awards.
The company said: “Despite an increasingly volatile environment globally, Mr Soriot has led AstraZeneca to deliver strong results in 2024, with another year of robust top line growth and impressive results from the pipeline.”
Many people have been killed and many injured after taking an AstraZeneca Covid “vaccine”, with the maximum payout just £120,000.
Injured victims must prove they are “at least 60 per cent disabled” in order to qualify for any payment.
Donald Trump U-turn means US faces Covid jab ban
COVID jabs could be banned in America under new plans backed by health figures in the Trump Administration.
Dr Jay Bhattacharya (above), who co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration, has been nominated to lead the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and has backed a petition calling for the mRNA jabs to be paused and retested.
The story was reported by mailonline and yet, still, despite mounting evidence, the mainstream media insist on using inflammatory language while reporting. For example, the paragraph from mailonline below includes the word “disputed” when no such word is needed:
Several experts poised for top jobs in US health agencies subscribe to the disputed idea the shots are causing widespread side effects and deaths.
Why not include the words “heavily supported” idea instead? Why choose ‘disputed’ unless you were being heavily one sided?
Proof that this disgusting level of propaganda still supporting those experimental interventions is being promoted by the craven. Watch how they will try to rewrite their part in all this when the fertiliser hits the ventilation. Not least no to wait now.