By Oliver May
A GROUP of expert doctors have urged Government to suspend all Covid-19 mRNA jabs until side-effects are fully investigated – saying there are more harms than benefits for anyone under 70.
Writing in the peer-reviewed Journal of Insulin Resistance, one of the UK’s most eminent Consultant Cardiologists Dr Aseem Malhotra – one of the first to take two doses of the jab – says that, until all data on the shots have been independently analysed, “any claims purporting that they confer a net benefit to humankind cannot be considered to be evidence based”.
He also slammed “unethical, coercive and misinformed policies” supported by the Government and his fellow medical professionals.
In a two-part research paper entitled “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on Covid-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine”, real-world data reveal that, in the non-elderly population, the number needed to vaccinate to prevent one death from the virus runs into thousands.
Dr Malhotra says: “Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.
“It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally.
“Authorities and sections of the medical profession have supported unethical, coercive and misinformed policies such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, undermining the principles of informed consent.
“These regrettable actions are a symptom of the ‘medical misinformation mess’: The tip of a mortality iceberg where prescribed medications are estimated to be the third most common cause of death globally after heart disease and cancer.
“The unprecedented rollout of an emergency use authorisation vaccine without access to the raw data, with increasing evidence of significant harms, compounded by mandates that appear to serve no purpose other than to bolster the profits of the drug industry, have highlighted modern medicine’s worst failings on an epic scale, with additional catastrophic harms to trust in public health.
“There is a strong scientific, ethical and moral case to be made that the current Covid vaccine administration must stop until all the raw data has been subjected to fully independent scrutiny.”
This might be the most horrible thing you have heard, but we must give the dangerous people who still trust the government boosters until they stop being a problem.
These "people" want to jail us, hurt us and they do not give a shit about what is true: They want to be right and tell me what to do, because they are narcissists that feel no value in themselves unless they can dominate others.
I'll help to pay for their boosters, just I like Albert Bourla to have - of course not his own best kind of Pfizer jabs and pills that make him "sick" again and again without being sick, but give him some J&J, and give the J&J CEO some Moderna, and Moderna CEO really want some AstraZeneca - Because these companies really trust each other to provide their competitors some of the good stuff, and not from that broken machine in Spain?
Am I a bad person? If these people can be saved, I'm OK with that but not by giving up my freedom.
These jabs hold NO benefit to anyone. Why pick on the elderly and experiment on them? Make HCQ and Ivermectin freely available.