"Midazolam, morphine and syringe drivers are critical to a good death..."

The history behind the scandal

By Jacqui Deevoy

WITH what we know now, these few sentences below, spoken by Dr Luke Evans MP to former Health Secretary Matt Hancock in a House of Commons conversation on April 17 2020, will send shivers down your spine:

“A good death needs three things. It needs equipment, it needs medication and it needs the staff to administer it.”

Then Dr Evans asked: “Do you have enough syringe drivers in the NHS to keep people comfortable when they’re passing away?” 

The conversation (which can be found here) is a strange one: cold and dispassionate.

The problem with what Dr Evans (above) said back then is this: ‘a good death’ is a well-known and much-used euphemism – in medical circles anyway – for euthanasia. As a doctor, Evans would know this.

During this conversation, Evans and Hancock were discussing end-of-life drugs (Midazolam and morphine specifically) and syringe drivers (used to pump these ‘end-of-life’ meds into a person’s body). They weren’t discussing any kind of medical treatment. Nor were they discussing any kind of cure.

Evans was checking with Hancock that there were enough supplies of these medications to give to people presenting with ‘Covid’ in care homes, hospitals and even in their own houses. Why?

Dr Evans would have known that using these drugs together would worsen any respiratory symptoms a patient might be experiencing and that repetitive or constant administration of these drugs would lead to death.

He would have known that the drugs he mentions were the exact same drugs that were prescribed to end the lives of the people put on the Liverpool Care Pathway, an end-of-life protocol for the terminally ill, which involved, not only these ‘anticipatory’ drugs but also the starving and dehydrating the patient.

It was very clear what Hancock and Evans were talking about during this conversation almost four years ago : they were talking about mercy killings, putting people out of their misery, involuntary euthanasia.

If Evans ever tries to argue that he was not referring to euthanasia and that by ‘a good death’ he meant ‘a comfortable passing’, he’ll easily lose. If his true aim was to help people die in a comfortable manner, he most definitely wouldn’t be thinking about prescribing drugs which were banned from being used in Death Row executions in several states in the US because their use was said to constitute ‘prolonged torture’.

This is NOT a good death: in fact, it’s just about as far from a good death as you can get.

People who had experience of almost dying under the influence of this horrendous concoction of medications claim that it’s a process of slow suffocation; that it’s like being waterboarded; like a long drawn-out drowning.

Evans would also know that hastening a person’s death, for whatever reason, is illegal in the UK.

One of Evans’ constituents wrote to him in November 2022, asking questions about why the Government had taken such a drastic and shocking approach. In a reply she received on December 13, 2022, Dr. Evans, referring to the House of Commons exchange, mentions how, in April 2020, when the discourse was filmed, “not a lot was known about Covid-19”. He states that, as a doctor and GP, he has helped care for many dying people and that palliative care is imperative.

The implementation of Covid protocol NG163 was underway at this point, which involved plying people with benzodiazepines and opioids until they died. Both Evans and Hancock must have known what that entailed.

There is evidence aplenty now that thousands of people died because of NG163 (later updated and renamed NG191), many of them never having tested positive for any kind of ‘deadly’ disease. Some of those who died because of this protocol were just old and frail; others had chest or urine infections, or other curable ailments; many had gone to hospital because of a heart problem, a kidney infection, a fall, a broken bone and some, from December 2020, from a jab reaction.

With blanket Do Not Resuscitate orders (DNRs) in place on the files of all care home residents and anyone over 60 admitted into hospital and with no visitors allowed, patients and residents were at the mercy of medics implementing a protocol that many of them surely knew was wrong.

In the letter to his constituent, Evans provides links to the original talk at the House of Commons (see above) and to articles on palliative care and Midazolam. He also provides a Full Fact article which attempts - and fails - to debunk a video David Icke made on the subject. https://fullfact.org/online/david-icke-midazolam/

In conclusion, the letter seems to gloss over the important issue of euthanasia, with Evans referring to the obvious culling as ‘palliative care’. He can deny that euthanasia is happening and that the Liverpool Care Pathway – abolished in 2014 – is still being used in all but name; but facts are facts, evidence is evidence and the truth has a habit of coming out.

After almost three years of searching, many relatives of the innocent people who died because of these protocols are now in possession of incontrovertible proof that their loved ones were the victims of democide – death by government policy – and many are taking this evidence to court.

Once the first case is won, there will be an avalanche of new cases. And when people realise what the real cause of all those hospital and care home deaths was, letters from the House of Commons will do nothing to save the MPs.

---

• Jacqui Deevoy produces and presents a live chat show every Friday 7pm till 9pm for Unity News Network, livestreamed on X/Twitter and on Rumble.

• Watch the film ‘A Good Death?’ produced by Jacqui Deevoy and Ickonic, here: https://ickonic.com/Watch/1163

• catch up with news on her latest documentary ‘Playing God’ here: https://crowdfunder.co.uk/p/playing-god-final-phase

• Support her writing work here: https://buymeacoffee.com/6if8md4zvx