Multiple jabbed had multiple heart scars
Damage in left ventricle, pulmonary vein, left atrium, right atrium and right ventricle
By Gary Chappell
A STUDY of autopsies has shown patients who received up to six Covid jabs had multiple heart scars – with evidence showing 64 scars in the left ventricle alone.
The study, published by JACC Journals, examined three patients who died of unexplained cardiac arrest and were found to have multiple micro scars (MMS) in their heart tissue.
These micro scars were located in areas such as the left ventricle, the junction of the pulmonary vein and left atrium and the right ventricle and right atrium.
Notably, all three patients had received multiple Covid-19 boosters (five doses each for two patients and six for the third). Prior to their deaths, these patients experienced arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation and new-onset non-sustained ventricular tachycardia.
The report also notes the following:
“Regarding micro-scars in the left ventricle, 64 scars were traced. A global survey showed that any type of Covid-19 jab appears to instigate cardiac arrhythmias and Covid-19 jabs may lead to cardiac conduction abnormalities. These mechanisms are speculated to arise from molecular mimicry or spike protein production, an escalated inflammatory response and the eventual scar and fibrosis.”
While the authors of the study suggest a potential association between Covid jabs and scarring, they stop short of claiming causality, instead suggesting more research must be carried out. The hypothesis revolves around the spike protein, which is produced following vaccination, triggering immune responses that could lead to inflammation, microvascular injury and eventual fibrosis – scarring of the heart tissue.
“Shame on MPs and journalists who buried their heads in the sand”
Former MP Andrew Bridgen commented on the study when it was shared on social media. He wrote: “It saddens me immensely to post this, over two years after I raised all the issues of concern about the Covid 19 jabs in the Chamber of the House of Commons along with the scientific evidence to prove it.
“Shame on all the MPs and the journalists who buried their heads in the sand or worse attacked me personally for speaking out.
“So many lives lost and damaged which could have been avoided. The mRNA treatments must be immediately suspended in humans and animals.”
Still this week, the NHS has posted on social media advertising the Spring booster. This despite it now being known that Covid jabs are not “safe”, nor are they “effective”. In fact, much evidence points to them being “very dangerous” [News Uncut’s quotes marks].
Killed by a Covid jab? Not our problem, says Canadian Government
The horror stories regarding Covid jabs just keeping on coming. An Ontario court has dismissed a family’s claim for a teenager who died weeks after receiving the covid jab, stating that Health Canada has “no duty of care” to Canadians harmed by governments’ Covid policies and that “a possible side effect of receiving a Covid jab is death”.
Can anyone remember any person in any government across the world telling us this when urging people to “get their safe and effective jab”?
Isn’t the truth more that governments consider the consequences of taking these jabs are on you and you alone? That even their own salaries are more important than, for example, fixing the not-fit-for-purpose vaccine damage compensation scheme? You know, the one which pays just £120,000 for a Covid jab-induced death and insists on a person being at least 60 per cent disabled in order to qualify for any payment at all?
This week, MP’s voted for themselves to receive a pay rise of £2,500. This despite the fact we have been told repeatedly that there is a “£22billion black hole” in the public finances. It seems, however, that there is always money available for MPs, their wasteful expenses system and foreign aid. But none available to improve the vaccine compensation scheme. No money available and no appetite available to fix it, either.
It’s just disgusting they are still promoting these killer injections and here in Australia too. These MP’s obviously only think about the raises they are getting.
In order to understand how the laws designed to "protect consumers" are so radically skewed toward irresponsibility via unaccountability look no further than the complicity of the administrators of "justice" which constitute a protection racket for otherwise culpable perpetrators of fraud and deceit. https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/pfizer
If you examine the "resolutions" you will notice there are in fact few "verdicts" and that individuals involved are NEVER prosecuted (mostly for publicly traded companies while smaller companies often have executives who enter guilty pleas.) The fines are chalked up to " the cost of doing business." Speaking of such... Where is the SEC on these matters? How can billions of dollars in fines be in the shareholders best interest? The answer? Fraud IS CONSIDERED AN ACCEPTABLE BUSINESS PRACTICE by regulators (SEC FDA)that ultimately results in a successful sales growth benefitting shareholders. BTW what percentage of the fines go to victims? ZERO no doubt.
Noticeably also is that because the doctors/researchers et al involved in these cases of fraud are NEVER NAMED actual human victims have little recourse than to suffer in silence. IF DOCTORS WERE NAMED we would then be able to identify victims through their exposed records a function of which would be legal recourse for the victims. Additionally, and this is big, those doctors accepting the kickback and bribes would likely lose their licenses and Big Pharma would lose their PUSHERS. We can't have that can we?
Where are our supposed "representatives ??? Busy distracting us with Trump's and Musk's evil missteps and criminal intent... right? I didn't show up and vote because there ARE NO DECENT
people in politics... NONE.... Anywhere ( except maybe Bhutan). Name the government position elected or appointed and you will find that position filled with a corrupted or corruptable person.
Participation in the continuing fraud that is democracy means you accept its terms which
began being falsified in about 1790. ( in U.S.).