People's lives have been totally and utterly ruined by these vaccines

Mark Sharman interview on The Highwire

NEWS UNCUT journalist Mark Sharman appeared on Del Bigtree’s The Highwire this evening to discuss media censorship, the fall of journalism and vaccine damage.

Here is the interview in full:

Mark Sharman [MS]: “We have lost the free press and it goes against every principle I’ve ever been taught and grown up with. We were always taught to be fair and balanced, show both sides of a story and let the viewers decide. And that has just completely gone out of the window and it feels to me like free speech and democracy with it.

“We’re in a room and the walls are coming in and the ceilings coming down and the floors coming up. And you’ve got big tech on one side and mainstream media on the other closing us out.

‘Somebody at world level, as you say, decides what the answer is. And we’re all prevented from that point for asking any questions. It is not what journalism is about. It never has been. And it’s a very, very dangerous precedent.

“Who are these people that are deciding what’s information and what’s misinformation? Who are they to dismiss scientists, eminent scientists and doctors who question the official narrative and say it’s misinformation. Since when did science stop? Since when did people stop reviewing it and asking questions and debating it? And we’re losing the ability to debate.”

Del Bigtree [DB]: “Let me ask you for those of us in America that don’t know what Ofcom is because that’s who sent out this warning to all the media agencies basically saying, toe the line for the Government. You can have someone that questions it, but you should immediately stop them and hold them back from spreading misinformation.”

MS: ‘Well, in the UK, newspapers are partisan, they have political leanings and a political agenda, television has always been independent. We don’t have the Fox News and CNN with different lines. They are independent. Ofcom is the Government regulator, in normal times actually take a light touch on things that they don’t tend to intervene. Usually they’ll react if they get viewer complaints. So as I said, on the other clip [GB News], I’ve never seen an instruction that warns broadcasters not to question Government policy.

“But what’s emerging is it’s not really government policy. It’s worldwide policy. It is WHO policy. The actual instructions on social media that they list out on YouTube what you can and can’t say about some of the treatments that might have been available, as opposed to the vaccines. It’s all listed there. It’s not a coincidence that every country in the Western world reacted in exactly the same way. What’s happening in America, exactly the same as what’s happening here and in Europe. Anybody that questions that official line is taken down.

“I’ll give you an example of how far it’s got. I’m very concerned about vaccine injuries at the moment. It’s a subject that’s not really been investigated properly. We have we have a politician called Sir Christopher Chope, a knight of the realm who has taken up the case of vaccine harm and he’s introducing a bill into into Parliament. His speech as an elected member of the British Government under parliamentary privilege, in the House of Commons, was taken down by YouTube.

“I mean, how dare they. This is democracy at work and somebody in America decides that that is inappropriate for us to discuss, we cannot discuss vaccine injuries. How far has it got to go before people say I’ve had enough of this and say, ‘Hang on a minute. We live in a democracy’.”

DB: “I was just interviewed by an ex New York Times reporter the other day and I was saying to my friends, how refreshing it was just that that no agenda no baloney hard questions being asked of me. They just challenged me from every side, but I enjoyed it. There seemed to be just strong inquisition, strong scepticism. That’s the place of the journalist, a journalist is supposed to always be sceptical. We are not cheerleaders for any point of view.

“I remember being in journalism classes. And you know, at that time I was a fictional writer. And so I was always getting in trouble. I was getting bad grades in journalism class, because the teacher kept saying, ‘Del, you’re not being objective. You are instilling your opinion, journalism is about showing all sides, being fair and balanced to let the viewer decide what they’re gonna do or either the reader is journalism dead. Are they even teaching that in journalism school because I don’t see anywhere in the news, certainly not in America, where we have that objectivity. And well, all it is is opinion.”

MS: “Well, it wouldn’t be so bad if there were various various opinions of it. You’re only allowed one opinion at the moment. Look, I can understand the media in the first two or three months of Covid. I can understand why everybody was was nervous. We didn’t know for this thing was and it was probably right to be cautious.

“But it became obvious quite early, that the numbers were being inflated. They weren’t correct. And since then, why are we not questioning? Why governments gave indemnity from prosecution to Pfizer? Why would you allow Pfizer to be secretive about the trials for 75 years?

“Why aren’t the mainstream looking at some of the Pfizer results, which are clearly showing – clearly showing – that either they’re either flawed or fraudulent. And the vaccines certainly don’t work as well as we’ve been led to believe. The questions are there to be asked, but no one in mainstream media is asking, but it’s worse than that. I mean, constantly, the figures of death figures were posted every night the scare tactics continued. And I’m I’m sorry to say that they exaggerated the situation in hospitals, they exaggerated those that were unvaccinated in ICU. And they they vilified those who didn’t want to take the vaccine. They actually created a deliberate split in the nation. It’s beyond precedent.”

DB: “People ask me if you could take a time capsule, 20 years from now, I said, I don’t want one 20 years from now, I want one five years from now. I want to see where we’re at five years because we’re either gonna stand up against this and grab a hold of our liberty and our freedom and what our nation’s once believed in and hold back that sort of technocratic takeover by this horrible cabal of media owned by tech and Pharma and all these issues, or we’re not. What will the history books write about this pandemic, how the media handled it. Will these people regret how they acted here?”

MS: “Well, it depends at what level it comes out and what questions are asked and what’s revealed. I have great hope for your country actually. We’re up against the same powerful enemy. But I do feel as though you’ve got much more firepower on our side of the fence. if you will. And I’m hoping that it’ll break in America, because if it breaks there, it’ll break everywhere. And that’s really our hope.

“We’re in the same situation the bill you just read out, the California bill, we’ve got exactly the same coming in the UK in the online safety bill. It deals with misinformation and disinformation and basically makes OfCom again, in partnership with the big tech companies, the arbiter of what misinformation and what’s information, Who gives them that power? Who gives them the knowledge? Who suddenly decided they were the foundation of all things accurate? But of course, like you I’m suspicious of where the where the power is coming from and what the message is and what the agenda is.”

DB: “What is your message to people that aren’t reporters? Aren’t journalists like us? We’re out there. I know you’re trying to get the story. You’re fighting to get the stories of vaccine injured into the limelight so that people recognise what’s happening there. But for your average person listening right now, what is it they need to do in order to maintain freedom in a space that maybe they’re not fully aware of which is the news and media what what can your average person do right now?”

MS: “It’s very difficult because the average person certainly in this country probably still believes what they’re being told. There’s a very, very significant amount of people who do watch independent news and, as a consequence, don’t trust the mainstream media at all.

“But bear in mind, we have the BBC, which retains a reputation for truth around the world. I’m sorry to say it’s not deserved at the moment. They employ their own disinformation reporter and they and they also have a thing called the BBC Trusted News Initiative. But when you look at that, that’s in partnership with Microsoft and Facebook and all the same people. And it’s interesting, they call it the BBC Trusted News Initiative. They wouldn’t have called it the [Mark] Zuckerberg trusted news initiative.

“So sooner or later, something major has to happen to make people realise that everything they’ve been told is not true. Not everything’s untrue. Not everything they’ve been told is true. And in particular – in particular – it’s why people were not told that this vaccine was experimental, that it had not gone through trials and that it was a risk to some people.

“Our figures now, for a yellow card reporting system for vaccine injuries are something like 450,000 [figure is 1.4million]. We all know that’s a fraction of the real number. And I’m getting all kinds of emails and talking to all sorts of people and, naturally, it’s heartbreaking. People’s lives have been totally and utterly ruined by these vaccines.

“Now, t doesn’t apply to everybody. But they should have been made aware. Number one, were you really at risk from the virus? For the vast majority population, they weren’t. And number two, if you do take these jabs, here is what it is and here is what the risk might be. And that never happened. There could be a huge anger in the population if they find out they were continually told it was safe and effective, when in fact it was neither.”

DB: “You’re absolutely right. That has been a major focus of us on The Highwire. Mark, I want to thank you for taking the time today to join us. It’s always a it’s always a great moment to discover that I have a brother across the ocean that is fighting the same fight, standing for the same truth in journalism.

“It’s so important to us here and I just want you to know you’re not alone. We’re here with you. If you have any breaking story, anything you ever want to share here in America, you’re right, I do believe America leads this fight and we really have the ability to beat, to stand as a beacon of light, of liberty of, free speech. I want to thank you for sharing your sentiment. Though you’re living in a different place, we are all under the same regime at the moment that has to change. Thank you for taking the time today.”

MS: “Thank you very much. Please keep up the good work.”