Risk damaging your child's heart to reduce Covid risk from 0.00004%, say UK Government

Dr Mike Yeadon says he will hold authorities culpable of murder

By Julia Ross

DAYS after the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Group (CCVAG) called on the UK Government to halt the rollout of Covid jabs due to safety concerns, England, Scotland and Northern Ireland today followed Wales in giving the go-ahead for children aged between five and 11 to be injected.

This age group are at virtually zero risk from suffering severe disease from the virus. Meanwhile the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency’s (MHRA) Yellow Card system has reported roughly 2,000 deaths post jab so far. Two studies, one from Oxford University, here, and the other from The Journal of the American Medical Association, here, found that the heart condition myocarditis increased hugely after a Covid-19 jab.

The governments have made their decision based on ‘draft’ advice from the Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunisation [JCVI], not even waiting for the official rubber stamp.

It is important to note that the JCVI statement says they are offering parents the chance to take up a “non-urgent” jab, adding: “Most children aged five to 11 have asymptomatic or mild disease following infection with SARS-CoV-2. Some may experience post-Covid-19 symptoms lasting longer than a few days. Children aged five to 11 who are not in a clinical risk group are at extremely low risk of developing severe Covid-19 disease. 

“It is estimated that over 85 per cent of all children aged five to 11 will have had proper SARV-CoV-2 infection by the end of January 2022 [last month]. Natural immunity arising from prior infection will contribute towards protection against future infection and severe disease.”

So for example, using the table above, a five year old boy will already have a 0.00004 per cent risk of severe disease from Covid. Once he gets the virus and develops natural immunity, this risk reduces further. What governments have done today is recommenced you jab your child even further to reduce that risk. Surely it is simply not needed?

Former vice-president and chief scientific officer at Pfizer's Pharmaceutical Company in Kent, Dr Mike Yeadon, said: “The UK Government isn’t competent to assess risk benefit for experimental medical treatments.

“It’s literally impossible for several parts of the regulatory filing to have been adequately completed because the data is missing.

“They’re shooting in the dark and we are the targets.

“With adults, at least there’s a chance they might work out that these “vaccines” don’t work and are harmful, even lethal in an unacceptably minority.

“But kids? They rely on adults to care for them. Children are at an effectively zero risk of severe outcomes if infected and most are likely already to be immune by now.

“Kids do not need this experimental, gene-based intervention. There’s no possible good accruing time them.

“On the contrary, there will definitely be many injuries, some serious that will alter their lives. It’s very likely that there will be deaths.

“Given all the information necessary to show that risk / benefit is NEGATIVE, that c19 vaccination WILL DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD, is PUBLIC, going ahead in my view constitutes reckless endangerment of young people’s lives.

“In the event of a single death, I personally will hold many people involved in this decision and putting it into practise culpable of murder.”

More odd is the JCVI stating openly that these jabs will make absolutely no difference whatsoever at the moment. They “might” make a difference if there happens to be a future variant, but they really do not know.

The JCVI said: “Vaccination of children aged five to 11 who are not in a clinical risk group is not expected to have an impact on the current wave of Omicron infection.  The potential benefits from vaccination woo apply mainly to a future wave of infection.”

The two announcements came hot on the heels of an open letter last week from the CCVAG to JCVI Covid-19 sub-committee chair Professor Lim Wei Shen, UK Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty and Health Secretary Sajid Javid urging them in the strongest terms to immediately halt the entire childhood vaccination programme.

Needless to say, this carefully argued appeal — based on solid data and research — not only fell on deaf ears but got zero mainstream media coverage. News Uncut understands that the CCVAG press release was sent to at least three national newspaper editors, all of whom ignored the concerns.

In it, an array of highly qualified doctors and scientists point to the undisputed increase in deaths among young males since the vaccine was rolled out to their age groups and demand an urgent investigation.

They also call for a proper risk/benefit analysis — something that has been conspicuous only by its absence for two years, right across the Covid response board — before extending the programme and point out that at least 80 per cent of children are likely to have now acquired natural immunity due to the rapid spread of the Omicron variant.

But their request remains unanswered and the Pharma steamroller trundles on, leaving in its wake an ever-growing toll of death and injury to which it seems it has now become a hideous ‘new normal’ to turn a completely blind and unquestioning eye.

Sadly, it is perhaps only when the very youngest of the children being sacrificed on the disingenuous altar of protecting granny start suffering in the same way as their older brothers and sisters, that the penny will properly begin to drop.

MHRA Yellow Card injuries and deaths