"US has destabilised international security"

US and UK's involvement in Ukraine war puts us all in the direct line of fire, says Putin

By Oliver May

THIS week, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said his focus is “delivering for the British people”.

Twenty-four hours after that statement, it was confirmed by Andrei Kelin, Russian Ambassador to the UK, that Britain was “directly involved in the war in Ukraine” after “allowing” British-made missiles to be fired into Russia.

We use the word “allowing” lightly because, as Russian President Vladimir Putin has claimed, Ukraine does not have the resources or skills to launch intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), so it is assumed there is direct Western involvement.

But naturally this move by the UK begs the question: What, exactly, is Starmer promising to deliver to the British people?

Death, destruction, decades of famine – the end of the UK as we know it?

Where in Labour’s election manifesto did it mention a promise that they would take us into direct war with Russia?

I mean, it pretty sure as hell did not mention a whole lot of other misgivings Labour has passed as policy, but I think we can all agree that this is the biggest one of all to have ‘forgotten’ to mention.

And anyway, when does such a move not warrant a full debate in Parliament first?

Once again, it seems, the UK has blindly followed the lead set by the trigger-happy US, who themselves “allowed” Ukraine to fire ICBMs into Russia on Tuesday, November 19.

Putin made a public address on Thursday, November 21, where he promised there will always be a response.

His initial ‘response’ was to fire missiles into Ukraine. But his warning should be heeded by the war-hungry West, the majority of whom want no part in a conflict that has little to nothing to do with them.

Putin said: “We believe that we have the right to use our weapons against military facilities of the countries that allow to use their weapons against our facilities. And in case of escalation of aggressive actions, we will respond resolutely in a mirror way.”

What does Starmer think will happen by “allowing” British missiles to directly attack Russia?

We could ask the same question of US President Joe Biden but, frankly, most of us know that it is not him thinking for himself.

Jennifer Arcuri hinted that something like this might happen in our interview with her on November 7 saying: “They [the current US administration] will try anything to overturn Donald Trump’s election victory.”

News Uncut understands that Trump can still be inaugurated as planned, but what is written down in ‘rules’ and what happens in practice are two very different things.

Putin also claimed that “the US has destabilised international security” with its move on Tuesday. Commentator Alex Jones said in his show on Thursday, November 21 that Trump and Elon Musk were “working behind the scenes” to negotiate a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. We can only act like sitting ducks as we wait and hope that this is really the case.

It is worth noting, whether you choose to believe it or not, that Putin has repeatedly said in public that he is willing to negotiate a peace deal.

Interestingly, that was not in Labour’s manifesto either…