Why link to Covid jabs and excess deaths in Telegraph will help awaken the masses
It is just a shame it took the mainstream almost four years to investigate and report
By Oliver May
HOW many lives could have been saved if what many of us were shouting from the rooftops for the best part of four years was investigated and reported by the so-called mainstream media sooner than June 4, 2024?
On Tuesday, The Telegraph ran a story most of us thought would never see the light of day in a major newspaper:
It might sound crude, but it hardly takes a ‘scientist’ or a genius to suspect such a link; never before the rollout of the Covid jabs have we seen excess deaths in these horrific numbers.
The Telegraph said in its story: “Researchers from the Netherlands analysed data from 47 Western countries and discovered there had been more than three million excess deaths since 2020, with the trend continuing despite the rollout of ‘vaccines’ [News Uncut quote marks] and containment measures.
“They said the “unprecedented” figures “raised serious concerns” and called on governments to fully investigate the underlying causes, including possible ‘vaccine’ [News Uncut quote marks] harms.
“Writing in the BMJ Public Health, the authors from Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, said: “Although Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ [News Uncut quote marks] were provided to guard civilians from suffering morbidity and mortality by the Covid-19 virus, suspected adverse events have been documented as well.
“Both medical professionals and citizens have reported serious injuries and deaths following vaccination to various official databases in the Western World.”
They added: “During the pandemic, it was emphasised by politicians and the media on a daily basis that every Covid-19 death mattered and every life deserved protection through containment measures and Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ [News Uncut quote marks]. In the aftermath of the pandemic, the same moral should apply.”
Why this story appearing in a mainstream newspaper is significant is that, for all the efforts by outlets such as News Uncut and the like, a good percentage of the British public will not be swayed unless a traditional source of media tells them so.
The Telegraph’s story will help awaken those minds. That can only help put the pressure on those who need to be held accountable. And in future, those sleepy heads now stirring into life may think twice about what medication they choose to put in their body.
Repercussions should, fingers crossed, come thick and fast now, although News Uncut remains sceptical, even now. The recent television documentary into the infected blood scandal should serve as a warning about how corrupt governments shut down any possible legal action.
But the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) should be very nervous indeed.
They describe their role as follows: “The MHRA is the executive Agency of the Department of Health and Social Care that acts on behalf of the Ministers to protect and promote public health and patient safety, by ensuring that healthcare products meet appropriate standards of safety, quality and efficacy. We keep watch over medicines and devices and take necessary action to protect the public promptly if there is a problem.”
These two sentences pose a particular problem for the MHRA:
“We keep watch over medicines and devices and take necessary action to protect the public promptly if there is a problem”
And:
“… protect and promote public health and patient safety, by ensuring that healthcare products meet appropriate standards of safety, quality and efficacy.”
In fact, the MHRA contacted the reporter of the story above, Sarah Knapton, on a previous occasion, when she reported on the now withdrawn AstraZeneca jab causing blood clots.
The MHRA warned her to tone down her report, or face being banned from future press briefings.
This is a national body set up to, in their words, protect the public from harm, using threatening behaviour against a journalist highlighting those harms.
Let’s hope also that one of the few voices in Parliament to have raised similar concerns, Andrew Bridgen, is now no longer laughed at, scoffed at and dismissed.
As ever, we live in hope.
This piece in the Telegraph appears as Parliament is dissolved, no MPs in the HoC to face an 'Urgent Question'. Electioneering is in full throttle, pages of print devoted to the blustering politicians repeating their inane soundbites, and promising not to raise taxes, blah, blah, and, of course, the worthwhile coverage of D-Day.
One might think this is a most convenient time for Sarah Knapton's write-up on excess deaths in relation to the 'Covid-19 ' 'vaccines'.
Absolutely shambolic.