FINALLY, AN MSM BREAKTHROUGH ON JABS

...but they are wrong on death and injury figures and still support it

By Mark Sharman

WEDNESDAY March 15, 2023. The day when mainstream newspapers finally conceded a sliver of ground in the battle for Covid truth.

The Daily Express launched a campaign for the vaccine-injured with this two-page spread:

The Express campaign is centred on improving vaccine-injured compensation. It is a major breakthrough and very encouraging for self-help groups such as UKCVFamily.

But why does the paper’s leader column have to counter it by saying ‘the successful vaccine scheme allowed us to break out of a series of lockdowns’ while speaking of ‘the small number of people who suffered side-effects’?

Is this how the erstwhile wilfully blind mainstream media – and governments for that matter – will try to extricate themselves from the scandalous and potentially dangerous roll-out of unproven ‘vaccines’? By drip-feeding small concessions while still lauding the old narrative? After all, nobody pointed a finger of suspicion when the Pfizer jabs (and AstraZeneca earlier) were suddenly withdrawn.

Is the truth too hot to handle?

*The last Yellow Card reporting statistics to be published by the MHRA recorded more than 2,400 deaths following a Covid jab, with injuries running into the thousands.

The Guardian meanwhile, in highlighting overt Conservative Government pressure on the BBC over lockdowns included this little gem: “A BBC source said: ‘The BBC had a clear responsibility to its audience to present the official Government advice and information as accurately as possible’.”

That, in a nutshell, is what many in independent media and millions of so-called ‘anti-vax’ protesters have said all along, that the BBC has acted as a de facto agent for Government propaganda, whether it be lockdowns, masks, Covid death numbers, the jabs or the fear campaign that drove needles into millions of arms. And it dovetails neatly with Ofcom “advice” to broadcasters, effectively saying ‘stick with the Government story.’

There were so many falsehoods that should have been interrogated, so many questions to be asked, but the silence was deafening.

Where does this leave the hapless BBC Director-General Tim Davie (above), who continues to plead that impartiality is a cornerstone of the Corporation? Is he also wilfully blind, or does he really not know what goes on beneath him? Which is worse?

His Disinformation Unit, in collusion with its Big Tech partners in the Trusted News Initiative, have systematically smeared, cancelled or ridiculed hundreds of valid world experts who spoke out against the Covid narrative.

Many were included in the film “Ask the Experts” produced by Oracle Films, a serious work which Panorama derided as containing dangerous conspiracy theories.

Oracle’s director Philip Wiseman read the Guardian paragraph about the BBC’s responsibility to tow the Government line. He posted this response: “No. You had a responsibility, as does any journalist worth their salt, to scrutinize decisions Government was making at that time and to ask the questions that were in the public’s interest.

“One is doing principled journalism. The other is being a PR/propaganda wing of a morally bankrupt Government. Guess which one you did?”

Quite.

*Andrew Bridgen MP is giving a 20-minute speech in the Commons on Friday afternoon in which he is expected to present more damning data on vaccine efficacy and safety. News Uncut wonders whether he will ask Jeremy Hunt to provide evidence of a single life that was saved by the jab, let alone the six million the Chancellor claimed today.