Just WHO do they think they are?

World Health Organisation wants a Pandemic Treaty - meaning it will take complete control of you

By Mark Sharman

BORIS JOHNSON’S journey through Brexit to 10 Downing Street was fuelled by the winning mantra Take Back Control but as the nation is unmasked, so too is that familiar phrase.

On the one hand the Government wants to Take More Control - over us, the UK people. Three bills, on Policing, Online Safety and Human Rights, all carry the potential for stricter authoritarian control over how we behave, speak or even think. 

On the other, it could be about to Give Away Control - to the World Health Organisation (WHO) in a move that would remove powers of critical decision-making and, ironically, Sovereignty.

The WHO wants to introduce a global ‘Pandemic Treaty,’ which would bind its 194 member nations into a worldwide protocol for dealing with disease outbreaks such as Covid-19.

Consultations and recommendations will be discussed this August, with the intention of putting the treaty in place by 2024. Only a two-thirds majority is required to make the change but, once agreed, all member countries must abide by the decision.

This means that any measures, including mandatory vaccines, digital passports, lockdowns, travel restrictions, school closures and mask wearing will be enforced; the UK Government would be powerless to make its own decisions, regardless of the effectiveness of those measures and/or public opinion.

Given that there is increasing evidence of secrecy and potential fraud over pharmaceutical trials, together with deaths and injuries from the experimental mRNA vaccines, mandating them at world level would be a momentous breach of personal autonomy and democracy itself. 

When will Boris Johnson bring this to Parliament’s and the public’s notice? At present all that is required is a ‘yes’ from each nation’s Health Minister – and the deed is done.

Dr Astrid Stuckelberger, who worked for the WHO for 20 years before turning whistle-blower, has warned that the organisation’s current step-back from restrictions is just a game while the new plans are laid. She warns that every country should send a public letter of protest to Geneva. 

And the World Council for Health [WCH], a coalition of scientists, doctors, lawyers and civil society advocacy organisations, has said in an open letter: “The proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights.

“It increases the WHO’s suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanising lockdowns and enforce expensive, unsafe, and ineffective treatments against the will of the people.

“The WCH believes that the people have a right to participate in any agreement that affects their lives, livelihoods and well-being. However, the WHO has not engaged in a process of public participation, which is evidence that its priority is capturing more power for itself and its corporate accomplices, than serving the interests of the people. Without an unbiased democratic process, any agreement by the WHO, acting via the United Nations, will be unlawful, illegitimate and invalid.

“The WHO cannot be allowed to control the world’s health agenda, nor enforce biosurveillance. While it receives funding from public sources belonging to the people, it is caught in a perpetual conflict of interest because it also receives substantial funding from private interests that use their contributions to influence and profit from WHO decisions and mandates.”

The WHO is an agency of the United Nations, but also relies on private donations, notably from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which contributed almost a billion dollars last year alone.

This is the same Bill Gates who is intent on vaccinating the world come what may – and the man who recently said “sadly” –yes sadly – that “natural immunity had worked better than vaccines on Covid 19”.

Donations of that size inevitably bring power and influence and Gates himself has never been shy of airing his views on medical issues, Covid and beyond. So how is it right that an organisation with apparent private and corporate input can dictate to nations on how to run their affairs?   

Or is this ‘Treaty’ a major step towards global government, aka The Great Reset outlined by the World Economic Forum?

The WEF is an all-powerful partnership between corporations, Governments and hugely wealthy individuals including the same Bill Gates. Their vision is all about central world control, via digitalisation, of health, finance, food supply and climate change, to name just some of their goals. Individuality of nations and people will not be an asset.

And the pace of change is accelerating. As WEF Founder Klaus Schwab tellingly flags in his book, Covid-19, The Great Reset, “The Covid-19 crisis cannot go to waste.”

The EU, meanwhile, will be eager participants. From this summer the European Council will no longer object to compulsory vaccination, they will insist on Covid certificates for travel and daily life, will work towards a digital ID for every European citizen and introduce digital currency by the end of next year.

So many of those ‘conspiracy theories’ derided and debunked by Big Tech, the fact checkers, the media in general and the BBC in particular, appear to be coming to fruition. Who really is Taking Control?