But are they a good thing? At best they're a distraction away from the evil that has been and is being perpetrated in the name of Convid, at worst it will be ammunition for globalists to push for a catastrophic transfer of power to the WHO with their International Health Regulations and Pandemic Treaty. Look how incompetent our government has been, we need the WHO to take control will be the cries.
James Roguski is crying out on this subject to raise awareness...
Partly agree. However, at best surely *some* of the messages have woken more people to the fact that many of the restrictions were put in place to progress the career and profile of politicians? [deploy variants, blackmail over lockdowns etc].
True, but I think the benefits of the lockup files (hate that intended gung-ho sounding lockdown crap) information coming out are outweighed by the (very intended I believe) dangers of it providing potent ammunition for the WHO power grab and also grounds for the sheep, shills and charlatans to cover their backsides with 'oh we were so lied to 😱, we're excused, move on, in WHO/Starmer/whoever we can trust'. Evil scapegoats neatly castigated, shitshow rolls on.
I pretty much got it right from day zero, though the facts were still very unclear:
"Robert Malcolm Kay (on Facebook)
15 March 2020
·
Shared with Your friends
It's interesting to compare UK and US #coronavirus policies. Boris comes over as a bit of a prat, and his mention of 'herd immunity' is ghastly and insensitive (even though it is a common term in public health parlance, I wouldn't have dreamed of using it in public) but the restrained and considered UK strategy of public information, local treatment, containment and prevention is probably fairly sound.
I'd guess we will have between 1,000 to 5,000 extra deaths in the next month, mainly of very old, overweight men, which is significantly less than the annual UK deaths caused by really nasty Tory policies on benefits, poverty and drugs and inflicted on the young and middle aged.
Trump is throwing $50B taxpayers dollars at a $5B problem, mainly because he himself is fat, has high blood pressure, and is an elderly male. If this was a problem affecting only young african americans he would dismiss it as Fake News.
Its racism and agism and sexism, entrenched in US policy. "
But are they a good thing? At best they're a distraction away from the evil that has been and is being perpetrated in the name of Convid, at worst it will be ammunition for globalists to push for a catastrophic transfer of power to the WHO with their International Health Regulations and Pandemic Treaty. Look how incompetent our government has been, we need the WHO to take control will be the cries.
James Roguski is crying out on this subject to raise awareness...
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/the-man-with-his-finger-on-the-whos-pulse-james-roguski
https://open.substack.com/pub/jamesroguski
Would be great to see News Uncut amplifying this message!
Partly agree. However, at best surely *some* of the messages have woken more people to the fact that many of the restrictions were put in place to progress the career and profile of politicians? [deploy variants, blackmail over lockdowns etc].
Thanks for responding 🙂
True, but I think the benefits of the lockup files (hate that intended gung-ho sounding lockdown crap) information coming out are outweighed by the (very intended I believe) dangers of it providing potent ammunition for the WHO power grab and also grounds for the sheep, shills and charlatans to cover their backsides with 'oh we were so lied to 😱, we're excused, move on, in WHO/Starmer/whoever we can trust'. Evil scapegoats neatly castigated, shitshow rolls on.
I pretty much got it right from day zero, though the facts were still very unclear:
"Robert Malcolm Kay (on Facebook)
15 March 2020
·
Shared with Your friends
It's interesting to compare UK and US #coronavirus policies. Boris comes over as a bit of a prat, and his mention of 'herd immunity' is ghastly and insensitive (even though it is a common term in public health parlance, I wouldn't have dreamed of using it in public) but the restrained and considered UK strategy of public information, local treatment, containment and prevention is probably fairly sound.
I'd guess we will have between 1,000 to 5,000 extra deaths in the next month, mainly of very old, overweight men, which is significantly less than the annual UK deaths caused by really nasty Tory policies on benefits, poverty and drugs and inflicted on the young and middle aged.
Trump is throwing $50B taxpayers dollars at a $5B problem, mainly because he himself is fat, has high blood pressure, and is an elderly male. If this was a problem affecting only young african americans he would dismiss it as Fake News.
Its racism and agism and sexism, entrenched in US policy. "
Yes, I also spotted that: looks as if the officials were trying to calm it down, whilst the politicians went nuts for power and control.