NOT ENOUGH MONEY, NOT ENOUGH ADMISSION OF GUILT, NOT ENOUGH TRUTH
Government response to Covid jab indemnity petition is simply pathetic
By Jasmine Birtles
DID you sign the petition to ‘Remove indemnity from the manufacturers of the
Covid-19 vaccine’? Covid jab indemnity petition
If so, you will have had the Government response by now, full of such breathtaking misinformation such as “Even though the Covid-19 vaccines have been developed at pace, at no point and at no stage of development has safety been bypassed. These vaccines have satisfied, in full, all the necessary requirements for safety, effectiveness and quality.”
I’m not sure what standards the Government has used to determine safety, effectiveness or quality, but I suspect they are nowhere near the ones I use or that you use.
As the documentary ‘Safe and Effective’ by News Uncut journalist Mark Sharman showed, these jabs are clearly connected in some way to a myriad of diseases and, it seems, hundrds of thousands of deaths.
The Government response says: “As indemnities for manufacturers do not generally prevent individuals from pursuing a legal claim for compensation, the Government would not consider it necessary to seek to remove any such indemnity.”
In other words, Nothing to do with us gov. Sort it out yourself.
It adds: “The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) is a no-fault scheme that provides a one-off, tax-free payment of £120,000 to claimants who have been found, on the balance of probabilities, to have been seriously disabled as a result of a vaccine for a disease listed in the Vaccine Damage Payment Act 1979. The figure of £120,000 is a one-off lump-sum payment, not designed to cover lifetime costs for those impacted.”
Not enough. Not enough money, not enough admission of guilt and not nearly enough truth in any part of this response.
The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme is very difficult to navigate, offers a maximum of £120,000 in damages (not nearly enough for those with long-term injuries or bereavement) and to get anything from it you have to prove at least 60% disability.
It is an extraordinary situation where it is clear that fault lies with Big Pharma, not with taxpayers, but this Government feels that those who have been damaged should not be allowed to seek redress from the source of the problem.
One cannot help but wonder just how many MPs and, more likely, civil servants may have been paid to protect pharmaceutical companies from the bruising compensation claims they would otherwise be getting right now from around the world.
They can keep denying responsibility, keep screaming outrage and creating spurious reasons to attack individuals who speak out, but the arguments and excuses are waning.
Comments across social media and on newspaper articles (where they are allowed) show that practically no one is listening now. People are waking up.
The government is full of shit. Just as is always when it comes to damage or death by way of NHS or infected blood products nor drugs.
1. You cannot sue an individual doctor for malpractice. You sue the NHS institution itself.
2. To get a payment for having received knowingly contaminated blood products (1978-1991), you must PROVE when and what you received, that you suffered from chronic HepC when Maj doctors weren’t looking for HepC (it’s a great mimicker of RA, CFS, Fibromyalgia); can’t say from Anti-D (NI court proved was from Anti-D too) AND YOU MUST NOT HAVE EVER ENGAGED IN ANYTHING RISKY.
3. You cannot sue in a class action group case a drug manufacturer only as an individual. Hence US HepC victims won a class action against Pegasys (PEG Alpha interferon) for acute and chronic side effects but in UK no cases have been brought. It’s very expensive to prove damage in UK courts. We’re talking £150-200,000 legal fees.
PS I’m a victim of contaminated blood. I know the day, location of when and where I received transfusion (July 1986) But the proof of chronic HepC evidence is difficult.
The ex health minister Clarke (Bilderger, EU collaborator) was interviewed at Contaminated blood Enquiry when asked about the 1,000’s injured or dead he said ‘what does it matter’.
That’s how the elite think about the Covid jab victims. What does it matter? To them, not one iota
PS I HAVE JUST HAD AN ATTACK OF ONE OF THE CHRONIC SIDE EFFECTS OF PEGASYS - Severe cramping. PEG is a destroyer of neurological health. It’s a bitch - severe, painful, crippling spasms. Btw even though neuropathy began during Pegasys treatment, consultant refuse to admit it caused condition.
NHS staff remit- never admit anything the NHS has done was ever bad. Our national religion — the NHS
History has shown that no matter how big the lie or how many times it is repeated the truth will ultimately always prevail. Hence it does seem illogical that , in the face of data and expert opinion to the contrary of the standard messaging, that this is being ignored/rejected by authorities and main stream media.
Since the commencement of Covid and the vaccines there have been experienced and professional voices from the medical world raising concerns about the information we have all been given. As evidence grows to support their views, including, sadly, individual injuries and deaths, those in public positions willing to meet disapproval or rejection by their peers are providing a valuable service in opening the door to truth.
I found it interesting that the Israeli academic quoted by Andrew Bridgen is a criminologist, not a medical specialist. Is that why reaction to Mr Bridgen has been so aggressive?