"SO SUCCESSFUL WE ARE REMOVING IT"
No more Covid boosters until the autumn after Government U-turn
By Oliver May
THE offer of a Covid booster has been changed to run seasonally following advice from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI).
It is no longer possible to accept an offer of a booster jab due to what the JCVI is calling “the success of the programme”.
The Government has called the Covid jab “safe and effective” but the JCVI now recommends “moving to a more targeted offer to those considered to be at risk of serious illness”.
It has not stated why this move has been made.
The Covid jab does not stop transmission, it does not stop infection and has been linked to blood clots, myocarditis, pericarditis and strokes. There is also mounting evidence of injury and death after taking a Covid jab.
The Government updated its information on Covid boosters via the NHS website on January 25, “encouraging” people to come forward and get their jab before the “offer, part of the biggest and most successful programme in health history, ends next month.
It stated that the booster will now be offered seasonally to those considered at risk, saying: “The Government has accepted the JCVI advice, which recommends that the booster offer for all 16 to 49-year-olds who are not considered at risk should end at the same time as this autumn’s campaign.”
That JCVI advice was first published in a statement on the Government website on November 8, 2022.
Given the furore by national newspapers and TV media to report advice to take the jab, it seems odd that this news was not broadcast from the rooftops.
In addition, the mainstream has been relatively quiet to its readership on stories such as the ones published by America’s NBC News, which reported a study in The Lancet which says, “immunity acquired from a Covid infection is as protective as vaccination against severe illness and death”.
Over the past two and a half years, many others who suggested this were vilified and smeared as “conspiracy theorists” and “anti-vaxxers”.
MailOnline this week reported that doctors in Florida have been told by the state’s health authority to warn recipients of the Covid jab that it could cause heart attacks.
MailOnline saw fit to put the words “controversial new guidance” in its headline, something others may see as simply ‘informed consent’.
I have read so many write-ups on the “slow withdrawal”, “managed retreat” and “great reveal” around why so many of the MSM and MSM-adjacent are appearing to report on the jabocide, or why erstwhile jabophiles are doing very public but stage managed 180s, or why the jabs are being removed or their removal being demanded, and so on. Amid all of this are 3 observations that to the emergent awakened could be puzzling verging on paranoid:
1. Official phase 3 clinical trials are ending now, which we have known since the start. Why does no “commentator” or propagendist (sic) ever mention this? This seems like very important context when discussing any aspect of an experimental medical intervention’s availability, success or future.
ASTRAZENECA
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04516746
Phase 3 ends February 2023
PFIZER/BIONTECH
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04368728
Phase 3 ended 31 January 2023
MODERNA
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427
Phase 3 ended 29 December 2022
2. If the reason the end of phase 3 trials are not being mentioned as part of censorship, gaslighting or misdirection campaigns, to what end? Is it because the jabbed will realise they have been duped into being in a clinical trial? That the world will realise it really all has been an experiment and there has been no danger money paid to participants (which is how many experimental medical trials used to be tested on volunteers).
3. Or are the iatrogenesis and jabocide revelations, the “end of boosters” and 180 flip flops and protestations of erstwhile jabtards messrs Malhotra, Oliver, Campbell, Adams, Dalgleish etc all part of distracting us - limited hangout style - from asking what the actual results of the trials are? Again, this strikes me as at least equally newsworthy.
The ends of the clinical the trials are being airbrushed and memory holed in real time for a reason, which implicates every dubiously adjacent commentator.
Such good news!