

Discover more from News Uncut: Straight Talk, Hard Truths
By Mark Sharman
AN adage of war is that the closer one gets to the target the heavier the defensive flak. So should we be encouraged that the battle for truth over Covid ‘vaccines’ has intensified?
With 2023 barely under way, we have seen:
The Conservatives banish Andrew Bridgen from their ranks for raising safety questions in Parliament. He’s now threatening legal action against Matt Hancock for defamation.
American lawyer Robert Kennedy Jr start legal action against the BBC/Trusted News Initiative for conspiring to censor factual information..
Big Pharma promoter Bill Gates call for even greater censorship for anyone who questions vaccinations – timed, of course, just ahead of the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos.
Dr Aseem Malhotra ‘hijacking’ BBC News with his call for the ‘vaccine’ roll-out to be suspended.
Leaving Gates aside (as we will doubtless hear plenty more from this unelected world influencer over the next few days) the other three are significant milestones.
ANDREW BRIDGEN, MP for North-west Leicestershire, made a passionate speech in the House last month, calling for a complete suspension of Covid jabs based on what he described as “robust data of significant harms and little ongoing benefit”. A later tweet, now deleted, said it (Covid ‘vaccination’ harm) was the biggest crime since the Holocaust.
Not only did the Conservatives remove the whip from Mr Bridgen but, in an almost despairing attempt to smear him, Matt Hancock used Prime Minister’s Question Time to brand his comments anti-semitic, as well as anti-science and a conspiracy theory. Hancock was backed by Rishi Sunak.
Accordingly, the BBC and other media outlets falsely reported that Bridgen had compared jab damage to the Holocaust, when in fact he said it was the biggest crime since the Holocaust.
It may have been an unfortunate choice of words, but in no way was it anti-semitic, as confirmed by support he received from Jewish communities, including Norman Fenton, Professor Emeritus, Queen Mary University of London, whose father was a Holocaust survivor.
Now Mr Bridgen is challenging Matt Hancock to withdraw his comments.
It seems clear that Bridgen’s campaign is hitting a nerve. While he asks why shouldn’t an MP raise genuine concerns on behalf of the public, the BBC prints and tweets pieces in an attempt to discredit him, including unproven and unquantifiable figures on jab effectiveness. He insists his loss of the Conservative whip will only make him more determined.
The BBC, meanwhile, still refuses to acknowledge that Covid jabs could have anything to do with the alarming rise in excess deaths, which are becoming harder to explain as the numbers grow, particularly in young people. It beggars belief that the jabs are not included on the list of potential suspects, despite growing evidence from scientific institutions around the world.
The Corporation may, however, face some explaining of its own, over its participation in the Trusted News Initiative (TNI), a partnership with other major media outlets and Big Tech social media companies which is now accused of suppressing accurate news content.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR, chairman and chief litigation counsel for Children’s Health Defense has filed a lawsuit making antitrust and constitutional claims against the TNI, with the BBC among the named defendants.
The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas-Amarillo, alleges that media outlets partnered with several Big Tech firms to “collectively censor online news,” including stories about Covid-19 and the 2020 US presidential election that were not aligned with official narratives regarding those issues.
The lawsuit’s executive summary states: “The TNI exists to, in its own words, ‘choke off’ and ‘stamp out’ online news reporting that the TNI or any of its members peremptorily deems ‘misinformation.’
“TNI members have targeted and suppressed completely accurate online reporting by non-mainstream news publishers concerning both Covid-19 (on matters including treatments, immunity, lab leak, vax injury and lockdowns/mandates) and US elections (such as the Hunter Biden laptop story).”
The lawsuit also alleges: “By their own admission, members of the [TNI] have agreed to work together, and have in fact worked together, to exclude from the world’s dominant Internet platforms rival news publishers who engage in reporting that challenges and competes with TNI members’ reporting on certain issues relating to Covid-19 and US politics.
“While the ‘Trusted News Initiative’ publicly purports to be a self-appointed ‘truth police’ extirpating online ‘misinformation,’ in fact it has suppressed wholly accurate and legitimate reporting in furtherance of the economic self-interest of its members.”
The developments follow revelations from Twitter, and in the legal case Missouri v Biden, that US Federal Agencies were colluding with media and Big Tech companies over editorial content.
Kennedy Jr said: “Both Democracy and public health rely upon transparency and the unimpeded flow of information. The role of the press in democracy is to oppose all efforts at censorship and to maintain a posture of fierce, inquisitional skepticism toward government and other aggregations of power.
“BBC has betrayed its heroic role as a defender of free speech and a speaker of truth to power for bootlicking subservience to vested interests, a suppressor of dissent and a tool of totalitarianism.”
The BBC has yet to comment.
FINALLY, the BBC’s resistance to any whisper of harm from Covid-19 jabs was spectacularly pierced by Dr Aseem Malhotra, the London cardiologist who has been campaigning for their suspension.
He appeared on the BBC News to discuss statins and heart disease, but seized the opportunity to warn of Covid ‘vaccine’ harm and repeat his claims that the roll-out should be halted pending independent analysis.
It was a significant breakthrough on mainstream media and caught the presenter off-guard; as a TV professional myself I can imagine the angst in the control room. And God help the researcher who booked Aseem.
Needless to say, there is outrage in MSM:
The war is hotting up.
THE WAR IS HOTTING UP
Copy of my email exchanges with Andrew Bridgen, who always takes the trouble to reply, even though I'm not a constituent.
We need more of his calibre,as we lose any remnant of trust in and respect for, our so called leaders and their fellow travellers in the TNI and the 'experts'.
To quote Oliver Cromwell :
You have sat too long for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!"
Dear Mr Bridgen,
Here is a link to the latest plea from a group of senior Swedish doctors; it should add to the support for your campaign:
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/01/13/covid-vaccines-are-obviously-dangerous-and-should-be-halted-immediately-say-senior-swedish-doctors/
We are with you.
Best wishes,
Sent from my iPad
On 12 Jan 2023, at 13:25, BRIDGEN, Andrew <andrew.bridgen.mp@parliament.uk> wrote:
Since yesterday, I have received many hundreds of emails of support from all over the world, for my stance on questioning the safety and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines, and my subsequent suspension as a Conservative MP, it’s impossible to reply to you all individually so please know that I am deeply grateful for every letter of support.
I want you to know that my priority is to continue asking reasonable questions about the safety and effectiveness of those vaccines. I will not be deterred from asking those questions and demanding answers.
Throughout the covid pandemic, our young people suffered harm to protect others. Someone needs to stand up for them now, we have to know why they are still being given vaccines when we know the risk from side effects far outweighs the risk from covid?
Thank you once again for your support.
Kind regards
Andrew
Sent: 11 January 2023 14:30
To: BRIDGEN, Andrew <andrew.bridgen.mp@parliament.uk>
Subject: Re: mRNA vaccine injuries
Dear Mr Bridgen,
I have just read with dismay about your recent suspension ; I am disgusted,especially at the way in which the Holocaust comparison has been unfairly spun by your opportunistic critics.
Many many of us rely on the few like you ,who have the courage and the mettle to keep challenging the virtual omerta which now exists within our establishment.
We can but hope that your relegation to Independent status in the HOC, will allow you to continue with your much needed and highly valued campaign.
No doubt GB News will welcome you back and you have many admirers on substack.
Best wishes,
Sent from my iPad
On 16 Dec 2022, at 09:58, BRIDGEN, Andrew <andrew.bridgen.mp@parliament.uk> wrote:
Thank you for your kind email about my vaccines harm debate in the Chamber on Tuesday evening, this is an issue that I am extremely passionate about.
As I am sure you will appreciate I receive a great many emails from those who have suffered vaccine harm and the large majority are not constituents.
Simply put I would love to respond fully to each and every one of you but, regrettably, I don’t have the capacity to do so.
Please be assured though that I do read your emails and am touched by the often heart rendering stories they contain. They spur me on in my campaign for more transparency on this vitally important issue.
Once again, thank you for your kind words and support., may I take this opportunity to wish you and yours a very Happy Christmas.
Andrew Bridgen MP
North West Leicestershire
Sent: 14 December 2022 11:13
To: BRIDGEN, Andrew <andrew.bridgen.mp@parliament.uk>
Subject: mRNA vaccine injuries
Dear Mr Bridgen,
Although not a constituent I wish to congratulate you for your excellent and timely speech on the urgent need to withdraw the approval and use of these vaccines.
I also believe that the blanket indemnity awarded to the manufacturers should be revoked.
Now those of us who have been protesting and challenging the prevailing dogma since 2020,can have some much needed trust in and respect for,the few MPs who have the moral courage to speak out.
Along with Sir Christopher Chope, you are one of the few who dares to challenge the official omerta and the reluctance by the media and many of your parliamentary colleagues to give this scandal the attention it so urgently requires.
Perhaps we might see you on GB News,along with Sir Christopher.
Best wishes,