VILE ABUSE OF JAB INJURED
And certain MPs are still not helping
By Mark Sharman
THOSE injured by the Covid jab shun the word ‘victim’ but it is hard to see them as anything else in the light of the abuse they suffer.
Some is direct via social media, some indirect such as the on-going rejection by the MPs who are supposed to represent them.
One young woman told News Uncut that she is suffering from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), not from the effects of the jab, but from constant online messaging about her condition. Trolls have warned her to expect Alzheimer’s disease and even death within four years ‘and it serves you right for taking the jab.’
She pleads: “What’s wrong with people?”
Max Harrison, the young ballroom dancing champion whose life and career have been put on hold by severe heart problems, shared this example: “Suck it up buttercups. You believed the scam and took your chance with the jibby jab.”
And that was at the mild end of the vile messaging.
Abuse comes from both sides, those pro Covid jabs and those against.
Charlet Crichton, founder of the help group ukcvfamily.org says: “I’ve been told I’ll be killing people if we keep speaking out against the vaccine. On the other hand, we are all attacked by people who blame us for having the jabs.”
It is just possible to understand, if not to condone, the pro-jab messages. They come from people still wedded to the safe and effective mantra who remain wilfully blind and deaf to evidence of misadventure.
Those against the jabs, however, should surely see the injured as living proof in the fight against governments, medical authorities and pharmaceutical companies. Those injured by the jab need support as innocent (yes) victims of a psychologically sophisticated and highly persuasive Government campaign.
Either way this is online bullying. If the subject were race, trans-gender or recognised disability, the words ‘hate crime’ would be front and centre. It is similarly not acceptable to harass people who are already suffering physical damage and the mental trauma of not having their vaccine injuries recognised and treated.
Meanwhile MPs continue to display intransigence.
Elliot Colburn [below], the Conservative MP for Carshalton and Wallington, who spoke in favour of Covid jabs at the recent All Party Parliamentary Group debate, has taken an aggressive line with his constituents who are members of the local Stand in the Park protest group.
He has written: “I am afraid since our meeting, I have only been subjected to even more abuse and harassment, including my office being fly-posted, death threats sent online and in the mail, all for listening to experts who actually know what they’re talking about.
“I am taking police and civil action against those who can be traced and those I have CCTV footage of and will continue to launch proceedings against any further abuse or harassment I receive.
“My staff and my family find it extremely distressing and I have a duty of care to them. For that reason, I don’t have anything else to say.”
Surely Mr Colburn also has a duty of care to his jab-injured constituents and those of his colleagues across the UK?
There is, however, one glimmer of hope from Mr Colburn. He has written to Zulma Alfonso (featured previously by News Uncut) inquiring about progress with her NHS neurologist after she was injured by the jab
Zulma tells us: “I replied telling him that it went well but it was 17 months after my injury and seven months after my GP referral. I went on to explaining how the injury had changed my life and how little help I had received. I asked him to please work closely with Sir Christopher Chope as the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme has to change to include people like me.”
It is to be hoped that Mr Colburn follows up. He could begin by honouring his promise to watch the Oracle Films/News Uncut programme Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion.
He has already stated that the programme will not change his mind anyway, but to our knowledge he still has not taken time to view. Neither has he produced any evidence which he said ‘completely discredited’ the programme.
Most MPs send cut-and-pasted replies to concerned constituents, trotting out the safe and effective line. However John Mason [above], a Member of the Scottish Parliament and its Covid Committee, has plumbed new depths.
He was asked for this thoughts on Dr Aseem Malhotra’s paper on Covid jabs and Professor Christian Muller’s work on adolescent myocarditis versus Covid vaccines. His reply?
“It is unlikely that such a paper would be a priority for me to read. However, if I run out of other reading material, I might well have a look at it.”
Talk about a put-down.
It is high time these elected officials took time to study real world evidence – and separated scientific research from what they perceive is merely ‘anti-vaxx’ rhetoric.
Meanwhile the suffering of thousands of jab-injured continues and campaigns for more jabs are rolled out.
For the record, News Uncut does not condone online threats or physical harassment of Mr Colburn or any other MP. It is counter-productive and is just as serious as the online abuse suffered by the jab-injured.
PS: Mainstream media have devoted many column inches and broadcast minutes to the human rights issues surrounding the FIFA World Cup in Qatar. So where was the MSM outrage on the rights of NHS and care home workers when Covid jabs were mandated? It is hard to imagine a more basic human right than body autonomy. It seemingly depends on which convention is expedient at the time.
We also have an MP who says he’s on the side of the injured and bereaved who spoke in the first Chope APPG meeting and berated them for not being thankful enough! “You’ve got a meeting in the HoC, you wouldn’t have got that a year ago.” Can’t have the “little people” standing up for themselves can we. That would never do.
And what about all those people who lost their job because they refused to take the covid death shot?
And what about all those people who were disowned by their families because they refused to take the covid death shot?
And what about all those people who were refused medical care because of their refusal to take the covid death shot?
And what about all those people who were refused a organ transplant because they refused to take the covid death shot?
And how many of the jabbed called us "granny killers," and said we did not deserve any medical care because we had reasons, like religious reasons, for refusing the covid death shot?
How many of those people that you wrote about in the article may have participated in the discrimination of people who refused to take the covid death shot?